X-Received: by 2002:a1c:731a:: with SMTP id d26mr15248691wmb.108.1623340478348; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!news.neodome.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Neodome Admin Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,news.admin.peering Subject: Re: Ongoing flood from Neodome Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:54:38 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Neodome Message-ID: References: <1pa80y9.1ntv431sf1rnN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:54:38 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: neodome.net; mail-complaints-to="abuse@neodome.net" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4GeqIBIjul/aDqXBK5DiidftyqE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Bytes: 2108 Lines: 21 David Ritz wrote: > news.neodome.net is killfiled in two out of five or six news clients I > use, but is not for this user agent. In any case, user agents, for > which killfiles operate, still require downloading all of the overview > headers, at a bare minimum. Downloading thousands of XOVER headers of > noise is a waste of my resources and time. That you seem to think > little of it, suggests you are not a particularly good Usenet > neighbor. > > Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept. I’m not going to comment on everything you said, at least not now. However, I would like to say that since so many people are determined that it’s a DoS attack, I have no choice but to admit that my idea of what Usenet is is apparently quite different than what most people think. I’ll turn the posting off, for now partially, and then completely. -- Neodome